From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Pfaff Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] vswitchd: Add add_tunnel_ports() Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:18:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20120525171847.GH25106@nicira.com> References: <1337850554-10339-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1337850554-10339-6-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Simon Horman Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1337850554-10339-6-git-send-email-horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Add tunnel tundevs for tunnel realdevs as needed. > > In general the notion is that realdevs may be configured by users > and from an end-user point of view are compatible with the existing > port-based tunneling code. And that tundevs exist in the datapath > arnd are actually used to send and recieve packets, based on flows. > > Cc: Kyle Mestery > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman This seems reasonable at a glance. There are bits I might quibble with as this gets closer, but the structure seems reasonable.