From: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169: IO_PAGE_FAULT & netdev watchdog
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:20:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206012120.43235.plr.vincent@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120601125949.GA11973@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Thanks for the quick reply.
Le vendredi 01 juin 2012 14:59:49, vous avez écrit :
> Same thing if you reset and remove the pci device through sysfs then ask
> the PCI bridge to scan it again ?
I didn't try it before - but I should have, I know this.
rmmod; reset; modprobe -> doesn't work
rmmod; reset; remove; rescan -> doesn't work either (?!)
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42899 contains similar if not
> identical IOMMU messages (this #bz is messy but it may be of intereset to
> add yourself to the Cc: list btw).
I found it a bit after my post (while watching the archives, in case someone
replied without CC :) ). I posted on that bug as I couldn't find a way to just
add me to bug CC.
> The r8169 bug is real but the IOMMU message seems rather useless if not
> bogus.
Just being curious, feel free to skip over my questions:
If it's bogus, could it be a mis-interpretation of its state when the error
occurs (I don't know how CPU knows a fault happened, I guess some IRQ + some
register contain error status, address of error, some process/context
identifier) ? Or hardware bug ? Or MMU misconfiguration for some reason ?
If it's not bogus, would it be the sign of firmware bug (accessing some
unpredictable memory upon certain conditions) ?
> You can apply the attached patch but it may not do much for your problem.
> The patch below could make a difference though. Does it ?
I'll try either and both. Given the poor result I got from
reset/remove/rescan, I guess I should reboot between attempts, right ?
Should I prevent original module auto-loading at boot ? Maybe more than just
r8169 ?
Regards,
--
Vincent Pelletier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 21:31 r8169: IO_PAGE_FAULT & netdev watchdog Vincent Pelletier
2012-06-01 12:59 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-01 19:20 ` Vincent Pelletier [this message]
2012-06-01 20:13 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-02 9:08 ` Vincent Pelletier
2012-06-02 10:56 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-02 13:42 ` Vincent Pelletier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206012120.43235.plr.vincent@gmail.com \
--to=plr.vincent@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).