* [PATCH v2] inetpeer: fix a race in inetpeer_gc_worker()
@ 2012-06-05 13:00 Eric Dumazet
2012-06-05 13:09 ` Steffen Klassert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2012-06-05 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: Steffen Klassert, netdev
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
commit 5faa5df1fa2024 (inetpeer: Invalidate the inetpeer tree along with
the routing cache) added a race :
Before freeing an inetpeer, we must respect a RCU grace period, and make
sure no user will attempt to increase refcnt.
inetpeer_invalidate_tree() waits for a RCU grace period before inserting
inetpeer tree into gc_list and waking the worker. At that time, no
concurrent lookup can find a inetpeer in this tree.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
v2: use a call_rcu() to let the worker running on entries that cannot be
found by concurrent lookups.
include/net/inetpeer.h | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/inetpeer.h b/include/net/inetpeer.h
index b94765e..2040bff 100644
--- a/include/net/inetpeer.h
+++ b/include/net/inetpeer.h
@@ -40,7 +40,10 @@ struct inet_peer {
u32 pmtu_orig;
u32 pmtu_learned;
struct inetpeer_addr_base redirect_learned;
- struct list_head gc_list;
+ union {
+ struct list_head gc_list;
+ struct rcu_head gc_rcu;
+ };
/*
* Once inet_peer is queued for deletion (refcnt == -1), following fields
* are not available: rid, ip_id_count, tcp_ts, tcp_ts_stamp
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
index d4d61b6..dfba343 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
@@ -560,6 +560,17 @@ bool inet_peer_xrlim_allow(struct inet_peer *peer, int timeout)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_peer_xrlim_allow);
+static void inetpeer_inval_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct inet_peer *p = container_of(head, struct inet_peer, gc_rcu);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&gc_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&p->gc_list, &gc_list);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&gc_lock);
+
+ schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
+}
+
void inetpeer_invalidate_tree(int family)
{
struct inet_peer *old, *new, *prev;
@@ -576,10 +587,7 @@ void inetpeer_invalidate_tree(int family)
prev = cmpxchg(&base->root, old, new);
if (prev == old) {
base->total = 0;
- spin_lock(&gc_lock);
- list_add_tail(&prev->gc_list, &gc_list);
- spin_unlock(&gc_lock);
- schedule_delayed_work(&gc_work, gc_delay);
+ call_rcu(&prev->gc_rcu, inetpeer_inval_rcu);
}
out:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] inetpeer: fix a race in inetpeer_gc_worker()
2012-06-05 13:00 [PATCH v2] inetpeer: fix a race in inetpeer_gc_worker() Eric Dumazet
@ 2012-06-05 13:09 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-06 17:45 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2012-06-05 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: David Miller, netdev
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> commit 5faa5df1fa2024 (inetpeer: Invalidate the inetpeer tree along with
> the routing cache) added a race :
>
> Before freeing an inetpeer, we must respect a RCU grace period, and make
> sure no user will attempt to increase refcnt.
>
> inetpeer_invalidate_tree() waits for a RCU grace period before inserting
> inetpeer tree into gc_list and waking the worker. At that time, no
> concurrent lookup can find a inetpeer in this tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Thaks again!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] inetpeer: fix a race in inetpeer_gc_worker()
2012-06-05 13:09 ` Steffen Klassert
@ 2012-06-06 17:45 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-06-06 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: eric.dumazet, netdev
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:09:54 +0200
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>>
>> commit 5faa5df1fa2024 (inetpeer: Invalidate the inetpeer tree along with
>> the routing cache) added a race :
>>
>> Before freeing an inetpeer, we must respect a RCU grace period, and make
>> sure no user will attempt to increase refcnt.
>>
>> inetpeer_invalidate_tree() waits for a RCU grace period before inserting
>> inetpeer tree into gc_list and waking the worker. At that time, no
>> concurrent lookup can find a inetpeer in this tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
>
> Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
I'll apply this and queue it up for -stable, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-06 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-05 13:00 [PATCH v2] inetpeer: fix a race in inetpeer_gc_worker() Eric Dumazet
2012-06-05 13:09 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-06 17:45 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).