From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: pull-request: can-next 2012-06-04
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20120606.111538.2166268452793199990.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4FCBEAAB.90708@pengutronix.de>
	<4FCCD9A8.7030207@pengutronix.de>
	<4FCF9B3B.1070105@hartkopp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mkl@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org
To: socketcan@hartkopp.net
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FCF9B3B.1070105@hartkopp.net>
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:02:35 +0200

> i think there was a confusion about
> 
> 	linux-can and linux-can-next
> 
> pull requests that overlapped in the mail traffic that day.
> 
> The pull request of linux-can-next is still pending.
> 
> git://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next.git master

Strange, I thought I had pulled it, I've done so now, thanks.