From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Add interface option to enable routing of
 127.0.0.0/8
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:22:08 -0400
Message-ID: <20120608222208.GA19058@canuck.infradead.org>
References: <20120608101859.GH32152@canuck.infradead.org>
 <20120608.132338.892251811480644242.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:51055 "EHLO
	merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752687Ab2FHWWL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:22:11 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120608.132338.892251811480644242.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:23:38PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> What's the different between this patch and the one you posted
> half a day ago?

There is no difference. I didn't see my own mail appear in
my netdev folder and assumed git send-email had failed so
I did send it again. Sorry for the double post.