From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ipv4: Kill ip_rt_frag_needed().
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120613.225941.2175393318277942399.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120613.224203.297717896085583687.davem@davemloft.net>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:35:29 +0200
>
>> With your patch applied, we stop setting the DF bit after we
>> received a 'need to frag' ICMP message, but we don't fragment. We
>> send the packets out unfragmented. Before we removed
>> ip_rt_frag_needed(), we did the fragmentation according to the pmtu
>> informations we got from the icmp message. Now the router with the
>> low mtu has to do the fragmentation.
>
> Ok, then if we want to do the fragmentation locally then we have to
> consider my initial patch which updates the PMTU in raw_err().
>
> Did you test that? I mean specifically, this patch:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=133945597319917&w=2
>
> If it works for you, I will try to extend it to the other datagram
> cases.
Actually, thinking some more, we could extend my inet->pmtudisc patch
to achieve a similar effect.
Essentially we'd have a socket local PMTU value for datagram sockets.
Would you be OK with that approach?
I like the inet->pmtudisc way of solving this problem, because it:
1) Requires no special code to "remember" the flow used for the last
socket sendmsg() call.
2) In the events of a malicious attempt to poison the routing cache
PMTU information, only one socket will be harmed, rather than
the whole system.
I tried to look for inspiration in other systems, but all of them lack
source based routing and other things we support, so they just use
a purely destination address based cache for PMTU information.
Other systems also don't have to deal with SO_BINDTODEVICE which
influences the route.
So we absolutely have to make our PMTU operations with the full
context used to emit the packet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 9:29 [PATCH 2/5] ipv4: Kill ip_rt_frag_needed() David Miller
2012-06-11 11:16 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-11 11:20 ` David Miller
2012-06-11 11:28 ` David Miller
2012-06-11 11:42 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-11 23:02 ` David Miller
2012-06-12 11:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-12 20:33 ` David Miller
2012-06-13 4:22 ` David Miller
2012-06-13 8:01 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-13 9:42 ` David Miller
2012-06-13 10:07 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-13 10:22 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 5:35 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-14 5:42 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 5:58 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-14 5:59 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-06-14 6:36 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-14 6:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120613.225941.2175393318277942399.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).