From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takuya Yoshikawa Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip: Use standard __set_bit_le() function Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:00:13 +0900 Message-ID: <20120613230013.3cc59bf908616e94bb4ccef2@gmail.com> References: <20120613130054.b5695621.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20120613130304.0186fa9d.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20120613214157.0a5179d5358ec7f1b2646606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa , akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org, arnd@arndb.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Akinobu Mita Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:31:13 +0900 Akinobu Mita wrote: > >> Should this hash_table be converted from u16 hash_table[32] to > >> DECLARE_BITMAP(hash_table, 16 * 32) to ensure that it is aligned > >> on long-word boundary? > > > > I think hash_table is already long-word aligned because it is placed > > right after a pointer. > > I recommend converting to proper bitmap. Because such an implicit > assumption is easily broken by someone touching this function. Do you mean something like: DECLARE_BITMAP(__hash_table, 16 * 32); u16 *hash_table = (u16 *)__hash_table; ? Grant, what do you think about this? Takuya === drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c: static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev) { struct tulip_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev); u16 hash_table[32]; ... } drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c: static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev) { struct de_private *de = netdev_priv(dev); u16 hash_table[32]; ... }