From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 02/02] net/ipv4: VTI support new module for ip_vti. Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120614.205044.2206855389955918140.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120614091254.GT27795@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:45573 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753436Ab2FODur (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:50:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Saurabh Mohan Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:43:59 -0700 (PDT) > Thanks for your feedback. Responses are inline (@SM) ... > @SM: Yes, we do plan to do the same for ipv6. The timelines are not yet certain though. Top-posting and using this special "@FOO" way of replying to other people's emails is extremely hard to read and follow. Please use normal email quotation mannerisms to reply to people, otherwise many developers will simply give much lower precedence to your postings or flat out ignore them altogether. Thank you.