From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: johunt@akamai.com, kaber@trash.net, dbavatar@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
jmorris@namei.org, pekkas@netcore.fi, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greearb@candelatech.com
Subject: Re: Bug in net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:fib6_dump_table()
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:40:47 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625.154047.462435723648654696.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340429851.4604.11942.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 07:37:31 +0200
> [PATCH] ipv6: fib: fix fib dump restart
>
> Commit 2bec5a369ee79576a3 (ipv6: fib: fix crash when changing large fib
> while dumping it) introduced ability to restart the dump at tree root,
> but failed to skip correctly a count of already dumped entries. Code
> didn't match Patrick intent.
>
> We must skip exactly the number of already dumped entries.
>
> Note that like other /proc/net files or netlink producers, we could
> still dump some duplicates entries.
>
> Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
I've applied this.
But I wonder if it does the right thing, to be honest.
When tree change is detected, w->skip is set to w->count
But with your change, w->count won't be the number of entries to
skip from the root after the first time we handle a tree change.
So on the second tree change, we'll skip the wrong number of
entries, since the w->count we save into w->skip will be biased
by the previous w->skip value. So we'll skip too few entries.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 17:22 Bug in net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:fib6_dump_table() Debabrata Banerjee
2012-06-21 19:35 ` Josh Hunt
2012-06-21 20:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-21 21:50 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2012-06-22 3:34 ` Gao feng
2012-06-22 6:49 ` Josh Hunt
2012-06-22 8:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-22 13:44 ` Josh Hunt
2012-06-22 18:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-22 21:12 ` Debabrata Banerjee
2012-06-23 0:02 ` David Miller
2012-06-23 5:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-23 20:55 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2012-06-23 23:02 ` David Miller
2012-06-25 22:40 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625.154047.462435723648654696.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbavatar@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=johunt@akamai.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).