From: Saurabh <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next PATCH 01/02] net/ipv4: VTI support rx-path hook in xfrm4_mode_tunnel.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:02:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120628010213.GA4039@debian-saurabh-64.vyatta.com> (raw)
Add hook for rx-path xfmr4_mode_tunnel for VTI tunnel module.
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
---
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index e0a55df..04214c0 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1475,6 +1475,8 @@ extern int xfrm4_output(struct sk_buff *skb);
extern int xfrm4_output_finish(struct sk_buff *skb);
extern int xfrm4_tunnel_register(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family);
extern int xfrm4_tunnel_deregister(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family);
+extern int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_register(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler);
+extern int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_deregister(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler);
extern int xfrm6_extract_header(struct sk_buff *skb);
extern int xfrm6_extract_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb);
extern int xfrm6_rcv_spi(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c
index ed4bf11..4fc2944 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c
@@ -15,6 +15,68 @@
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
+/*
+ * Informational hook. The decap is still done here.
+ */
+static struct xfrm_tunnel __rcu *rcv_notify_handlers __read_mostly;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex);
+
+int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_register(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler)
+{
+ struct xfrm_tunnel __rcu **pprev;
+ struct xfrm_tunnel *t;
+
+ int ret = -EEXIST;
+ int priority = handler->priority;
+
+ mutex_lock(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex);
+
+ for (pprev = &rcv_notify_handlers;
+ (t = rcu_dereference_protected(*pprev,
+ lockdep_is_held(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex))) != NULL;
+ pprev = &t->next) {
+ if (t->priority > priority)
+ break;
+ if (t->priority == priority)
+ goto err;
+
+ }
+
+ handler->next = *pprev;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, handler);
+
+ ret = 0;
+
+err:
+ mutex_unlock(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_register);
+
+int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_deregister(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler)
+{
+ struct xfrm_tunnel __rcu **pprev;
+ struct xfrm_tunnel *t;
+ int ret = -ENOENT;
+
+ mutex_lock(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex);
+ for (pprev = &rcv_notify_handlers;
+ (t = rcu_dereference_protected(*pprev,
+ lockdep_is_held(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex))) != NULL;
+ pprev = &t->next) {
+ if (t == handler) {
+ *pprev = handler->next;
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_mutex);
+ synchronize_net();
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input_deregister);
+
static inline void ipip_ecn_decapsulate(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct iphdr *inner_iph = ipip_hdr(skb);
@@ -64,8 +126,14 @@ static int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
return 0;
}
+#define for_each_input_rcu(head, handler) \
+ for (handler = rcu_dereference(head); \
+ handler != NULL; \
+ handler = rcu_dereference(handler->next)) \
+
static int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ struct xfrm_tunnel *handler;
int err = -EINVAL;
if (XFRM_MODE_SKB_CB(skb)->protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP)
@@ -74,6 +142,10 @@ static int xfrm4_mode_tunnel_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct iphdr)))
goto out;
+ /* The handlers do not consume the skb. */
+ for_each_input_rcu(rcv_notify_handlers, handler)
+ handler->handler(skb);
+
if (skb_cloned(skb) &&
(err = pskb_expand_head(skb, 0, 0, GFP_ATOMIC)))
goto out;
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-28 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 1:02 Saurabh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-17 19:44 [net-next PATCH 01/02] net/ipv4: VTI support rx-path hook in xfrm4_mode_tunnel Saurabh
2012-07-17 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-29 1:29 Saurabh
2012-06-29 0:52 Saurabh
2012-06-29 1:00 ` David Miller
2012-06-08 17:32 Saurabh
2012-06-14 9:25 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-06-15 2:44 ` Saurabh Mohan
2012-06-15 5:46 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120628010213.GA4039@debian-saurabh-64.vyatta.com \
--to=saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).