From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120630.173848.305653960513565624.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1341000929-22933-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20120629.163408.1111786778802302299.davem@davemloft.net> <20120630122647.GA22647@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vyasevich@gmail.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:45175 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932069Ab2GAAit (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:38:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120630122647.GA22647@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Neil Horman Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:26:47 -0400 > This is wrong. Its a counter that increments every time we call sctp_make_sack, > so that we can create a unique generation identifier for use in tagging which > transports move ctsn in a given generation. It saves us from having to iterate > over a list every time we send a sack. Sorry, I missed the counter bump.