From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on
 bundled sacks
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 14:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20120701.144319.1120248166079750922.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1341061466-4186-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
	<20120630.173945.173993639982489712.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20120701124750.GA19498@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vyasevich@gmail.com,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:51692 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753846Ab2GAVnU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 17:43:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120701124750.GA19498@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400

> Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
> Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
> upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
> functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.

Yes, that would make sense.