From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:44:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20120701234424.GA23935@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> References: <1341061466-4186-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20120630.173945.173993639982489712.davem@davemloft.net> <20120701124750.GA19498@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> <20120701.144319.1120248166079750922.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vyasevich@gmail.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:45810 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753179Ab2GAXos (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:44:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120701.144319.1120248166079750922.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Neil Horman > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400 > > > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an > > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the > > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the > > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions. > > Yes, that would make sense. > I'll propose it in a few days. Neil