From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [net-next:master 294/295] drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:287:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'phy_init_eee' Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:10:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20120706091051.GA29206@localhost> References: <20120701113521.GA11294@localhost> <4FF69D1A.2030903@st.com> <20120706081556.GA28281@localhost> <20120706.013055.1908685269314070614.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: peppe.cavallaro@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:24604 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230Ab2GFJL2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 05:11:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120706.013055.1908685269314070614.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi David, > > I'm not sure if net-next tree is rebase-able. > > Never was, never will be. > > Please start to tone down your reports, many are overly verbose and > largely in the end not useful. It took me a while to get to know your working style and preferences. I'm aiming for the best quality service and will try to feed you with the information that matters. Thanks, Fengguang