From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:12:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20120709101215.GA6530@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <1340966060-2749-1-git-send-email-hayeswang@realtek.com> <1341221002-1522-1-git-send-email-hayeswang@realtek.com> <1341221002-1522-2-git-send-email-hayeswang@realtek.com> <20120704220458.GA1621@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <43E32504589B47B9846C4E9DAF98BF60@realtek.com.tw> <20120706152006.GA6981@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hayeswang To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120708.234857.1032244145219683435.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller : > Francois, what would you like me to do with these two patches? I > haven't seen full ACKs from you yet. You have two options: - You can apply the first (8106) patch. I tested it. I'm ok with Hayes point. Consider it Acked. - You wait for a pull request with both patches + the incremental bits for the second one. Some of the incremental bits are needed in the original patch itself while some make more sense before the patch itself. ETA: this evening or tomorrow morning at worst. If you go for the first option, I'll simply skip the first patch and apply again. It's the same work for me. -- Ueimor