From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/16] Metrics restructuring.
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120710.080703.916560084659556593.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
This patch series works towards the goal of minimizing the amount
of things that can change in an ipv4 route.
In a regime where the routing cache is removed, route changes will
lead to cloning in the FIB tables or similar.
The largest trigger of route metrics writes, TCP, now has it's own
cache of dynamic metric state. The timewait timestamps are stored
there now as well.
As a result of that, pre-cowing metrics is no longer necessary,
and therefore FLOWI_FLAG_PRECOW_METRICS is removed.
Redirect and PMTU handling is moved back into the ipv4 routes. I'm
sorry for all the headaches trying to do this in the inetpeer has
caused, it was the wrong approach for sure.
Since metrics become read-only for ipv4 we no longer need the inetpeer
hung off of the ipv4 routes either. So those disappear too.
Also, timewait sockets no longer need to hold onto an inetpeer either.
After this series, we still have some details to resolve wrt. PMTU and
redirects for a route-cache-less system:
1) With just the plain route cache removal, PMTU will continue to
work mostly fine. This is because of how the local route users
call down into the PMTU update code with the route they already
hold.
However, if we wish to cache pre-computed routes in fib_info
nexthops (which we want for performance), then we need to add
route cloning for PMTU events.
2) Redirects require more work. First, redirects must be changed to
be handled like PMTU. Wherein we call down into the sockets and
other entities, and then they call back into the routing code with
the route they were using.
So we'll be adding an ->update_nexthop() method alongside
->update_pmtu().
And then, like for PMTU, we'll need cloning support once we start
caching routes in the fib_info nexthops.
But that's it, we can completely pull the trigger and remove the
routing cache with minimal disruptions.
As it is, this patch series alone helps a lot of things. For one,
routing cache entry creation should be a lot faster, because we no
longer do inetpeer lookups (even to check if an entry exists).
This patch series also opens the door for non-DST_HOST ipv4 routes,
because nothing fundamentally cares about rt->rt_dst any more. It
can be removed with the base routing cache removal patch. In fact,
that was the primary goal of this patch series.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 15:07 David Miller [this message]
2012-07-10 15:35 ` [PATCH 0/16] Metrics restructuring Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 16:11 ` Joe Perches
2012-07-10 16:18 ` David Miller
2012-07-10 16:34 ` Christian Franke
2012-07-11 6:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120710.080703.916560084659556593.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).