From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Is TCP vulneribility patch (as in RFC 5961) done in linux? Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120716.222055.1416620349076908591.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1342427617.4812.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1342446411.23494.76.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <68700EDA775E5E47B5EBA9FF8AC0F15C078886@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: kkiran@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:46075 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750788Ab2GQFU4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 01:20:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <68700EDA775E5E47B5EBA9FF8AC0F15C078886@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Please do not top-post. Please do not quote an entire patch in a reply because it: 1) Wastes bandwidth, everyone on the list now has to receive another copy of the patch. Actually, because you did this twice, people have to receive 3 total copies. 2) It causes confusion in our patch management database, because now I have to sift through and remove the two extra copies of this patch your emails added.