From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] ipv4: Cache output routes in fib_info nexthops. Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120718.134944.1556490195867452914.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1342643659.2626.3636.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120718.133647.1948216070418950586.davem@davemloft.net> <1342644032.2626.3651.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:38211 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753362Ab2GRUtp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:49:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1342644032.2626.3651.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:40:32 +0200 > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 13:36 -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> Do you really think it's faster/better in this case? I did consider >> it. > > No, but code is smaller ;) Ok, I'm convinced :)