From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, davem@davemloft.net,
davej@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Prevent kernel stack corruption on long values of flush
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:00:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120718200049.GA17964@umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718173913.GA1298@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:01:26AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> The buffer size in read_flush() is too small for the longest possible values
> for it. This can lead to a kernel stack corruption:
Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index 2afd2a8..f86d95e 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -1409,11 +1409,11 @@ static ssize_t read_flush(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos,
> struct cache_detail *cd)
> {
> - char tbuf[20];
> + char tbuf[22];
I wonder how common this sort of calculation is in the kernel? It might
provide some peace of mind to be able to write this something like
char tbuf[MAXLEN_BASE10_UL + 2] /* + 2 for final "\n\0" */
You could use something like:
char tbuf[sizeof (unsigned long) * 24 / 10 + 1 + 2]; /* + 2 for final "\n\0" */
since there are roughly 10 bits for every 3 decimal digits.
But I'm obviously confused, because I don't understand why tbuf needs to be
any more than 10 + 2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 22:01 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Prevent kernel stack corruption on long values of flush Sasha Levin
2012-07-18 17:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-18 20:00 ` Jim Rees [this message]
[not found] ` <20120718200049.GA17964-63aXycvo3TyHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 20:33 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <20120718203304.GA18540-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 20:55 ` Jim Rees
[not found] ` <20120718205510.GA18374-63aXycvo3TyHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-17 18:29 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <507EF918.5030004-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-18 8:34 ` David Laight
2012-07-18 21:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <50072BA7.6070205@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50072BA7.6070205-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 21:43 ` Sasha Levin
[not found] ` <50072DEE.2000205-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 23:04 ` Jim Rees
[not found] ` <20120718173913.GA1298-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-17 17:59 ` Sasha Levin
[not found] ` <CA+1xoqcgWTP8pAY3Ok2R0JM-ZXSkGroEvAFcqP0KaK=dABiTXA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-17 19:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120718200049.GA17964@umich.edu \
--to=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).