From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ycheng@google.com
Cc: skinsbursky@parallels.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ruanzhijie@hotmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:34:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120808.143410.991859746378752444.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=cpODYa1xURk7BZBnWwx5q3OD8-xkCau7GNPn+1BS0oQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:48:32 -0700
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky
> <skinsbursky@parallels.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Dave.
>> What about this patch?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:48:20PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a fix for bug, introduced in 3.4 kernel by commit
>>> 1ab5ecb90cb6a3df1476e052f76a6e8f6511cb3d, which, among other things,
>>> replaced
>>> simple sock_put() by sk_release_kernel(). Below is sequence, which leads
>>> to
>>> oops for non-persistent devices:
>>>
>>> tun_chr_close()
>>> tun_detach() <== tun->socket.file = NULL
>>> tun_free_netdev()
>>> sk_release_sock()
>>> sock_release(sock->file == NULL)
>>> iput(SOCK_INODE(sock)) <== dereference on NULL pointer
>>>
>>> This patch just removes zeroing of socket's file from __tun_detach().
>>> sock_release() will do this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
>
> I has tested this patch and it works (so my kernel stops crashing
> using tun devices).
This patch needs to be formally resubmitted to netdev.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 11:48 [RFC PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-07-14 8:15 ` Al Viro
2012-07-19 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 12:53 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-08-08 17:48 ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-08-08 21:34 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120808.143410.991859746378752444.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruanzhijie@hotmail.com \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).