netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
	Leonardo Chiquitto <lchiquitto@suse.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next] bonding: don't allow the master to become its slave
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:39:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120809163906.6dc0b6d4@obelix.rh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344539003.2593.7.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 20:03:23 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 15:30 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > It doesn't make any sense to allow the master to become
> > its slave. That creates a loop of events causing a crash.
> 
> What if there are other intermediate devices, e.g. the slave is a VLAN
> sub-device of the bond?  And doesn't team also have this problem?
> 
> I think a more general check for such loops might be required.

Maybe patching netdev_set_master() to fail in the loop case is
the way to go.  That would work for bonding, team and bridge.

What you think?

fbl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-09 18:30 [net-next] bonding: don't allow the master to become its slave Flavio Leitner
2012-08-09 18:45 ` Leonardo Chiquitto
2012-08-09 19:03 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-09 19:23   ` Jay Vosburgh
2012-08-09 19:39   ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2012-08-09 19:55     ` Jiri Pirko
2012-08-09 20:52       ` Flavio Leitner
2012-08-09 21:09       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-09 21:27         ` Jay Vosburgh
2012-08-09 23:43           ` David Miller
2012-08-10 13:04             ` Jiri Pirko
2012-08-09 19:54   ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120809163906.6dc0b6d4@obelix.rh \
    --to=fbl@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=lchiquitto@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).