netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [flame^Wreview] net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:01:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120813170109.GD23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50293224.90803@intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:58:12AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >HOWEVER, it still doesn't address more fundamental problem - somebody
> >creating a socket and passing it to you in SCM_RIGHTS datagram will
> >leave you with a socket you can do IO on, still tagged according to who
> >had created it.
> >
> >AFAICS, the whole point of that exercise was to allow third-party changing
> >the priorities of traffic on sockets already created by a process we now
> >move to a different cgroup.  Consider e.g. this:
> 
> Correct that is the point of the exercise.
> 
> To fix this specific case we could add a call to sock_update_netprioidx
> in scm_recv to set the sk_cgrp_prioidx value.

On every received descriptor, that is?  Eeek...

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-13 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-13  1:53 [flame^Wreview] net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic Al Viro
2012-08-13  2:30 ` Al Viro
2012-08-13  5:55 ` John Fastabend
2012-08-13  6:23   ` John Fastabend
2012-08-13 12:18     ` Al Viro
2012-08-13 16:58       ` John Fastabend
2012-08-13 17:01         ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-08-13 17:31           ` John Fastabend
2012-08-13  9:08   ` Joe Perches
2012-08-13 11:22   ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120813170109.GD23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).