From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/1] net/hsr: Add support for IEC 62439-3
 High-availability Seamless Redundancy
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20120816.144625.603156941302668648.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <502D475C.9090208@xdin.com>
	<20120816.133036.1422214989121265534.davem@davemloft.net>
	<502D6332.1030303@xdin.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, shemminger@vyatta.com,
	kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jboticario@gmail.com,
	balferreira@googlemail.com
To: Arvid.Brodin@xdin.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35672 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756356Ab2HPVq3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:46:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <502D6332.1030303@xdin.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@xdin.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:16:34 +0000

> On 2012-08-16 22:30, David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> This is not the correct way to post a patch.
>> 
>> You should provide a proper full Subject: and commit message text in
>> the body of the email before the patch itself.
> 
> I fail to see what's missing from the Subject: line; please elaborate.

You left in the "Re: " etc. prefix.  You should never post new versions
of a patch as a reply, you should make new, fresh, mailing list postings.

And you failed to include the commit message body.  Everything you seem
to thing belongs in the "0/1" posting, at a minimum actually belongs
here in 1/1 too.