From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] cgroup: Remove CGROUP_BUILTIN_SUBSYS_COUNT Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:23:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20120906222354.GQ29092@google.com> References: <1345816904-21745-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <1345816904-21745-6-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <20120824232840.GS21325@google.com> <5039046D.1040402@monom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Li Zefan , "David S. Miller" To: Daniel Wagner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5039046D.1040402-kQCPcA+X3s7YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, Daniel. On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:59:25PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > >Wouldn't it be better to explicitly state that a following patch would > >reduce the SUBSYS_COUNT and stop putting builtin and module ones into > >different sections? > > Sure, can do that. I just to make sure I understand you correctly, > What do you mean with different section? Do you refer to the enum sorting? I meant that there's no reason to have all builtin ones contiguosly and then the module ones using two cgroup_subsys.h inclusions. Thanks! -- tejun