From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:25:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120917.142504.115219640757684297.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1347350987-8054-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <20120917.124953.1599275868994343219.davem@davemloft.net> <5057688B.3030509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, james.l.morris@oracle.com, eparis@parisplace.org, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: vyasevich@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:60227 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757027Ab2IQSZJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:25:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5057688B.3030509@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Vlad Yasevich Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:14:35 -0400 > I think he expected you to take Eric's patch that removed those > pieces. Eric's patch was a cleanup, so it went into 'net-next'. Nicolas's patch is a bonafide bug fix so needs to be targetted at 'net'