From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
james.l.morris@oracle.com, eparis@parisplace.org, sri@us.ibm.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:54:58 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120917.155458.777649470378504320.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50577F74.9040200@6wind.com>
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:52:20 +0200
> Le 17/09/2012 20:25, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:14:35 -0400
>>
>>> I think he expected you to take Eric's patch that removed those
>>> pieces.
>>
>> Eric's patch was a cleanup, so it went into 'net-next'.
>>
>> Nicolas's patch is a bonafide bug fix so needs to be
>> targetted at 'net'
> My fault, it was 'net-next'. I will rebase them against 'net'.
>
> Should I post the last one (4/4) separately, against net-next? Because
> without the '3/4', the cleanup is a bit larger and will cause a
> conflict during the merge.
Actually Nicolas, hold off on this for a bit.
I'm reconsidering putting Eric's patch into 'net' and that would
allow me to use your v3 patches as-is.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-17 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 17:40 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11 8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12 7:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-09-18 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:34 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01 ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120917.155458.777649470378504320.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).