From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120917.155458.777649470378504320.davem@davemloft.net> References: <5057688B.3030509@gmail.com> <20120917.142504.115219640757684297.davem@davemloft.net> <50577F74.9040200@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, james.l.morris@oracle.com, eparis@parisplace.org, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:60972 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754365Ab2IQTzE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:55:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <50577F74.9040200@6wind.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Nicolas Dichtel Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:52:20 +0200 > Le 17/09/2012 20:25, David Miller a =E9crit : >> From: Vlad Yasevich >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:14:35 -0400 >> >>> I think he expected you to take Eric's patch that removed those >>> pieces. >> >> Eric's patch was a cleanup, so it went into 'net-next'. >> >> Nicolas's patch is a bonafide bug fix so needs to be >> targetted at 'net' > My fault, it was 'net-next'. I will rebase them against 'net'. >=20 > Should I post the last one (4/4) separately, against net-next? Becaus= e > without the '3/4', the cleanup is a bit larger and will cause a > conflict during the merge. Actually Nicolas, hold off on this for a bit. I'm reconsidering putting Eric's patch into 'net' and that would allow me to use your v3 patches as-is. Thanks.