From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net] e1000: Small packets may get corrupted during padding by HW Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:03:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120917.230300.653531213751776624.davem@davemloft.net> References: <50578DE4.7080806@intel.com> <1347915723.26523.179.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <5057E3F2.5090504@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, tushar.n.dave@intel.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, mirqus@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: alexander.duyck@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:36110 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932121Ab2IRDDC (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:03:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5057E3F2.5090504@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:01:06 -0700 > Since MAX_TCP_HEADER starts at 160 the likelihood of it not getting > at least 16 bytes of padding is pretty low. I know it's not on many people's radar, but with SLOB it will happen a lot probably.