From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: recursive check rt->dst.from when call rt6_check_expired Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120919.134139.249773796773112801.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1347602097-18034-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com> <505980BE.5060300@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: roy.qing.li@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:55621 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756779Ab2ISRll (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:41:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <505980BE.5060300@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Gao feng Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:22:22 +0800 > 于 2012年09月14日 13:54, roy.qing.li@gmail.com 写道: >> From: Li RongQing >> >> If dst cache dst_a copies from dst_b, and dst_b copies from dst_c, check >> if dst_a is expired or not, we should not end with dst_a->dst.from, dst_b, >> we should check dst_c. >> >> CC: Gao feng >> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing >> --- > > Looks good to me,thanks rongqing :) An explicit "Acked-by: " is more useful to us than simply saying it looks good.