From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Andrew Jackson <ajackson@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/11] pps/ptp: Allow PHC devices to adjust PPS events for known delay
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:29:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920072954.GA6531@gundam.enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348082024.2636.16.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:13:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Initial version by Stuart Hodgson <smhodgson@solarflare.com>
>
> Some PHC device drivers may deliver PPS events with a significant
> and variable delay, but still be able to measure precisely what
> that delay is.
>
> Add a pps_sub_ts() function for subtracting a delay from the
> timestamp(s) in a PPS event, and a PTP event type (PTP_CLOCK_PPSUSR)
> for which the caller provides a complete PPS event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
Freelance ICT Italia - Consulente ICT Italia - www.consulenti-ict.it
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 19:09 Pull request: sfc-next 2012-09-19 Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:13 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] pps/ptp: Allow PHC devices to adjust PPS events for known delay Ben Hutchings
2012-09-20 6:57 ` Richard Cochran
2012-09-20 7:29 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2012-09-19 19:14 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] sfc: Add explicit RX queue flag to channel Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:15 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] sfc: Add channel specific receive_skb handler and post_remove callback Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:16 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] sfc: Allow efx_mcdi_rpc to be called in two parts Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] sfc: Fix maximum array sizes for various MCDI commands Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] sfc: Add support for IEEE-1588 PTP Ben Hutchings
2012-09-20 6:59 ` Richard Cochran
2012-09-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] sfc: Convert firmware subtypes to native byte order in efx_mcdi_get_board_cfg() Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] sfc: Support variable-length response to MCDI GET_BOARD_CFG Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:18 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] sfc: Expose FPGA bitfile partition through MTD Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:18 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] sfc: Bump version to 3.2 Ben Hutchings
2012-09-19 19:18 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] sfc: Avoid generating over-length MC_CMD_FLUSH_RX_QUEUES request Ben Hutchings
2012-09-20 20:42 ` Pull request: sfc-next 2012-09-19 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120920072954.GA6531@gundam.enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=ajackson@solarflare.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox