netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code
@ 2012-08-27  4:20 Wei Yongjun
       [not found] ` <CAPgLHd_71Qh90j9FCkT2cQ35wNMkZeLDwHT2QLP55_3gfzfjTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2012-08-27  4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jesse-l0M0P4e3n4LQT0dZR+AlfA, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
  Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>

The callback function of call_rcu() just calls a kfree(), so we
can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() + callback function.

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>
---
 net/openvswitch/flow.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
index b7f38b1..c7bf2f2 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
@@ -427,19 +427,11 @@ void ovs_flow_deferred_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
 	call_rcu(&flow->rcu, rcu_free_flow_callback);
 }
 
-/* RCU callback used by ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts. */
-static void rcu_free_acts_callback(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
-	struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts = container_of(rcu,
-			struct sw_flow_actions, rcu);
-	kfree(sf_acts);
-}
-
 /* Schedules 'sf_acts' to be freed after the next RCU grace period.
  * The caller must hold rcu_read_lock for this to be sensible. */
 void ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts(struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts)
 {
-	call_rcu(&sf_acts->rcu, rcu_free_acts_callback);
+	kfree_rcu(sf_acts, rcu);
 }
 
 static int parse_vlan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *key)

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code
       [not found] ` <CAPgLHd_71Qh90j9FCkT2cQ35wNMkZeLDwHT2QLP55_3gfzfjTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-08-28 23:00   ` Jesse Gross
  2012-08-31 19:57     ` David Miller
  2012-09-20 17:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Gross @ 2012-08-28 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Yongjun
  Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>
>
> The callback function of call_rcu() just calls a kfree(), so we
> can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() + callback function.
>
> spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>

Thanks Wei.

Acked-by: Jesse Gross <jesse-l0M0P4e3n4LQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code
  2012-08-28 23:00   ` Jesse Gross
@ 2012-08-31 19:57     ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-08-31 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jesse; +Cc: weiyj.lk, yongjun_wei, dev, netdev

From: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:00:24 -0700

> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>
>> The callback function of call_rcu() just calls a kfree(), so we
>> can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() + callback function.
>>
>> spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
>> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Thanks Wei.
> 
> Acked-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>

Applied to net-next

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code
       [not found] ` <CAPgLHd_71Qh90j9FCkT2cQ35wNMkZeLDwHT2QLP55_3gfzfjTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  2012-08-28 23:00   ` Jesse Gross
@ 2012-09-20 17:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2012-09-20 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Yongjun
  Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The callback function of call_rcu() just calls a kfree(), so we
> can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() + callback function.
> 
> spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei-zrsr2BFq86L20UzCJQGyNP8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org>

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  net/openvswitch/flow.c | 10 +---------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> index b7f38b1..c7bf2f2 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> @@ -427,19 +427,11 @@ void ovs_flow_deferred_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
>  	call_rcu(&flow->rcu, rcu_free_flow_callback);
>  }
> 
> -/* RCU callback used by ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts. */
> -static void rcu_free_acts_callback(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> -{
> -	struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts = container_of(rcu,
> -			struct sw_flow_actions, rcu);
> -	kfree(sf_acts);
> -}
> -
>  /* Schedules 'sf_acts' to be freed after the next RCU grace period.
>   * The caller must hold rcu_read_lock for this to be sensible. */
>  void ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts(struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts)
>  {
> -	call_rcu(&sf_acts->rcu, rcu_free_acts_callback);
> +	kfree_rcu(sf_acts, rcu);
>  }
> 
>  static int parse_vlan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *key)
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-20 17:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-27  4:20 [PATCH] openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code Wei Yongjun
     [not found] ` <CAPgLHd_71Qh90j9FCkT2cQ35wNMkZeLDwHT2QLP55_3gfzfjTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-28 23:00   ` Jesse Gross
2012-08-31 19:57     ` David Miller
2012-09-20 17:47   ` Paul E. McKenney

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).