From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, david.choi@micrel.com,
nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com, fabio.estevam@freescale.com,
shawn.guo@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 V2] phy/micrel: Implement support for KSZ8021
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:06:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209212106.53069.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921.145405.646315503417542108.davem@davemloft.net>
Dear David Miller,
> From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:50:46 +0200
>
> > Dear David Miller,
> >
> >> From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:33:12 +0200
> >>
> >> > I don't like it.
> >>
> >> Then I'm not applying your patches.
> >
> > What about the other part of my offer ?
>
> I read it, and if it were relevant to this discussion I would
> have quoted it.
>
> Can you please just fix up your patches exactly how I have asked you
> to so that I can get these bug fixes into the 'net' tree?
Sure, as you wish.
> This is completely rediculous, nobody else pushes back when I make
> simple coding style correction requests for their changes like you
> are.
You know, youth and all ... I was under the impression the patches shall be
checkpatch clean. But you got me there quite well, something must be wrong with
my precommit hook.
> You're behavior is self defeating, it's causing your work to not be
> useful and to not propagate to the very place where people can benefit
> from it the most.
Hey, this hurt. Anyway, about the checkpatch cleanup of the file, will that be
welcome (afterwards I fix the patchset and repost)? Now that you pointed out
there's more trouble in the file that is.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 2:52 [PATCH 1/3 V2] phy/micrel: Implement support for KSZ8021 Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 2:52 ` [PATCH 2/3 V2] phy/micrel: Rename KS80xx to KSZ80xx Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 2:52 ` [PATCH 3/3 RESEND] phy/micrel: Add missing header to micrel_phy.h Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/3 V2] phy/micrel: Implement support for KSZ8021 David Miller
2012-09-21 18:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-21 18:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-09-21 18:50 ` Marek Vasut
2012-09-21 18:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-21 19:06 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-09-21 19:11 ` David Miller
2012-09-21 19:19 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201209212106.53069.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.choi@micrel.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).