netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: amwang@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, kaber@trash.net,
	edumazet@google.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_tw_interval to specifiy the time of TIME-WAIT
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:44:16 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120928.024416.1606551804314602583.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348814399.7264.44.camel@cr0>

From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:39:59 +0800

> On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 13:05 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> Without appropriate confirmation that an early time-wait reuse is
>> valid, decreasing this interval can only be dangerous.
> 
> Yeah, would a proper documentation cure this? Something like we did for
> other tuning:
> 
> "It should not be changed without advice/request of technical experts."

No, we're not adding this facility.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-28  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27  8:41 [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_tw_interval to specifiy the time of TIME-WAIT Cong Wang
2012-09-27 14:23 ` Neil Horman
2012-09-27 17:02   ` Rick Jones
2012-09-28  6:33   ` Cong Wang
2012-09-28  6:43     ` David Miller
2012-09-28 17:30       ` Rick Jones
2012-09-28 13:16     ` Neil Horman
2012-10-02  7:04       ` Cong Wang
2012-10-02 12:09         ` Neil Horman
2012-10-08  3:17           ` Cong Wang
2012-10-08 14:07             ` Neil Horman
2012-10-09  3:42               ` Cong Wang
2012-09-27 17:05 ` David Miller
2012-09-28  6:39   ` Cong Wang
2012-09-28  6:44     ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120928.024416.1606551804314602583.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).