From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Possible networking regression in 3.6.0 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:57:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20121002155738.GA20331@redhat.com> References: <506955F3.8050304@googlemail.com> <1349082950.12401.669.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20121001193434.GA14236@redhat.com> <20121001.160115.1816241312626722150.davem@davemloft.net> <1349121884.12401.721.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1349192133.12401.768.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1349192919.12401.778.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , chris2553@googlemail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gpiez@web.de To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19753 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754712Ab2JBP5p (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:57:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1349192919.12401.778.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:48:39PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 17:35 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 22:04 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:01 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > > > > If you can find a way to more reliably trigger the case, that would > > > > help us immensely. > > > > > > I am building a KMEMCHECK kernel, as a last try before my night ;) > > > > This was a total disaster. KMEMCHECK dies horribly on my machine > > > > David, shouldnt we use a nh_rth_forward instead of a nh_rth_input in > > __mkroute_input() ? > > > > (And change rt_cache_route() as well ?) > > > > I am testing a patch right now. > > Yeah, this patch seems to fix the bug for me. Good work! Any idea why it didn't happen on every build for me ? >>From your description, this should have failed every time ? Dave