From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1715:2: error: too many arguments to function 'e100rxtx_interrupt' Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:40:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20121003.144040.1719867946304137902.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120928130608.GA5158@localhost> <20121003104652.GK1390@axis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jesper.nilsson@axis.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:59722 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753194Ab2JCSkm (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:40:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121003104652.GK1390@axis.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jesper Nilsson Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:46:52 +0200 > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:06:08PM +0200, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Hi Jesper, > > Hi! > >> FYI, a rather old build bug that's introduced by >> >> bafef0a cris build fixes: update eth_v10.c ethernet driver >> >> All error/warnings: >> >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c: In function 'e100_netpoll': >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1715:2: error: too many arguments to function 'e100rxtx_interrupt' >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1131:1: note: declared here > > Yep, I can't figure out why the followup patches never reached mainline, > but we have fixes for exactly that in our in-house tree. > I'll push some move patches after this merge window. It's a bug fix, even worse a build fix, why want until after the merge window?