From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: port starting location not random Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20121004.171246.1480276635491836767.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20121004140828.2d6f7bf9@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:46149 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757271Ab2JDVMs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:12:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121004140828.2d6f7bf9@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:08:28 -0700 > While working on VXLAN, noticed a bug in UDP introduced by: > > commit 9088c5609584684149f3fb5b065aa7f18dcb03ff > Author: Eric Dumazet > Date: Wed Oct 8 11:44:17 2008 -0700 > > udp: Improve port randomization > > > The logic for choosing where to start for port randomization incorrectly > calculates the starting port number. It is always ends up using > the low end of the range independent of the value of random. > This causes all UDP port searches to start at the same port. > > Doing the following fixes it but at the cost of doing a real divide. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > --- > Resend, previous send was not going to netdev. > > Not sure if worth fixing for stable, because only has performance impact > and some application might be depending on current broken behaviour. > > > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c 2012-10-01 17:06:53.107427436 -0700 > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c 2012-10-04 13:43:21.278960379 -0700 > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, un > remaining = (high - low) + 1; > > rand = net_random(); > - first = (((u64)rand * remaining) >> 32) + low; > + first = rand % remaining + low; Try replacing "remaining" with "(remaining << (64 - 16))" in the expression instead.