From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC] napi: limit GRO latency Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:40:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20121008124026.4057aba8@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1349718955.21172.3534.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1349719006.21172.3537.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20121008115835.3a3bfed6@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20121008.151035.1665672334154033755.davem@davemloft.net> <20121008121248.783e6dc4@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1349724612.21172.3643.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , rick.jones2@hp.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse@nicira.com To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:41249 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751172Ab2JHTlG (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:41:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1349724612.21172.3643.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:30:12 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote: > System is under stress, you dont want to increase load at this point, > but increase bandwidth. > > Really try this on a 40Gbe link and see how bad it is. Not everybody has 40Gbe hardware just lying around available for testing :-)