netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Supporting more devices with dev_alloc_name()
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:56:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121025165632.GC7857@raven> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1275 bytes --]

Hi list,

I've recently been trying to create large-scale L2TPv3 configurations
of up to 50,000 Ethernet pseudowires.

One of the limitations I've hit has been to do with dev_alloc_name().
By default, l2tp_eth uses "l2tpeth%d" for device names, which is
expanded by dev_alloc_name() into l2tpeth1, l2tpeth2, etc.  However,
the algorithm dev_alloc_name() uses to derive the next free number for
this scheme is bounded by the number of bits in a single page.  For
kernels/platforms with a 4kB page, this limits these "autoderived"
names to 32k.

In my testing I've been able to work around this by specifying
interface names during the bringup of the l2tpeth interfaces, thereby
bypassing dev_alloc_name() altogether.  Using this approach I am able
to comfortably create 50k interfaces, even on fairly modest hardware.
But it seems a shame to have to do this; it would be much nicer if
the kernel were able to autogenerate names for more devices.

Is this something that would be worth my working on a patch for, or
would the increased code complexity be too great an overhead to
consider for such outlandish use-cases?

Thanks,
Tom
-- 
Tom Parkin
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-25 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25 16:56 Tom Parkin [this message]
2012-10-25 17:50 ` Supporting more devices with dev_alloc_name() Eric Dumazet
2012-10-25 18:16   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121025165632.GC7857@raven \
    --to=tparkin@katalix.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).