From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Fix WoL on RTL8168d/8111d. Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:05:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20121028230523.GA26778@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <1351392414-32219-1-git-send-email-kibi@debian.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Cyril Brulebois Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1351392414-32219-1-git-send-email-kibi@debian.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Cyril Brulebois : > This regression was spotted between Debian squeeze and Debian wheezy > kernels (respectively based on 2.6.32 and 3.2). The fix was inspired > by , using > RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_{25,26} for the RTL8168d/8111d chipset. If someone experiences problems or has questions about WoL with Realtek's 816x chipsets, http://marc.info/?t=132079219400004 would imho be a better reference. [...] > Tested on top of a 3.2.23 kernel. It should still be relevant for current kernel. I'll give it a try. [...] > It looks like RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_{25,26} are kinda supposed to go > together so I kept both. Florent's testing gave the following results: > - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_25 only: FAIL. > - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_26 only: SUCCESS. > - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_25 + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_26: SUCCESS. I don't understand the VER_25 vs VER_26 difference. -- Ueimor