From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Michele Baldessari <michele@acksyn.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: support per-association stats via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:52:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030125230.GB13450@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508EE586.9060907@gmail.com>
On 10/29/12 at 04:22pm, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 07:37 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >Hm, ok, looking for the maximum rto seen is definately more efficient that a
> >high polling rate on the remaddr file. Still can't say I really like it as a
> >statistic though. While it helps in diagnosing a very specific type of problem
> >(applications that have a maximum allowable latency), its really not useful, and
> >potentially misleading, in the general case. Specificaly it may show a very
> >large RTO even if that RTO was an erroneous spike in behavior earlier in the
> >lifetime of a given transport, even if that RTO is not representative of the
> >current behavior of the association. It seems to me like this stat might be
> >better collected using a stap script or by adding a trace point to
> >sctp_transport_update_rto. If the application needs to know this information
> >internally during its operation to take corrective action, you can already get
> >it via the SCTP_GET_PEER_ADDR_INFO socket option on a per transport basis just
> >as efficiently.
SCTP_GET_PEER_ADDR_INFO doesn't help here as the whole point of this
stat is to get max(rto) as seen by the SCTP stack.
> The max_rto is reset after each getsockopt(), so in effect, the
> application sets its own polling interval and gets the max rto
> achieved during it. If the rto hasn't changed, then the last value
> is returned. Not sure how much I like that. I would rather get max
> rto achieved per polling period and upon reset, max_rto is
> accumulated again (easy way to do that is set to rto_min on reset).
> This way an monitoring thread can truly represent the max rto
> reported by association. It should normally remain steady, but this
> will show spikes, if any.
I would still reset it to 0 but I agree that it makes more sense to
return 0 if max(rto) remains unchanged within the observation period
rather than returning the previous max(rto).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 13:42 [PATCH net-next] sctp: support per-association stats via a new SCTP_GET_ASSOC_STATS call Michele Baldessari
2012-10-26 14:37 ` Neil Horman
2012-10-26 19:16 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-27 11:35 ` Michele Baldessari
2012-10-27 15:48 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-27 15:50 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-29 16:38 ` Neil Horman
2012-10-29 20:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-29 22:19 ` Neil Horman
2012-10-29 8:41 ` Thomas Graf
2012-10-29 11:37 ` Neil Horman
2012-10-29 20:22 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-30 11:15 ` Neil Horman
2012-10-30 14:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-30 14:54 ` Thomas Graf
2012-10-30 12:52 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2012-10-30 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-10-30 14:51 ` Thomas Graf
2012-10-26 20:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121030125230.GB13450@casper.infradead.org \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michele@acksyn.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).