netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: NETDEV <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: netlink -- Allow netlink_dump to return error code if protocol handler is missed
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:16:17 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121103191617.GD32458@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121103163958.GB6055@moon>

On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 08:39:58PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 08:17:50PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > >  static int inet_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > > Index: linux-2.6.git/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.git/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > @@ -1740,6 +1740,10 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
> > >  		else
> > >  			__netlink_sendskb(sk, skb);
> > >  		return 0;
> > > +	} else if (len < 0) {
> > > +		err = len;
> > > +		nlk->cb = NULL;
> > > +		goto errout_skb;
> > 
> > When family-level handler is absent and sock_diag returns error this error
> > gets propagated back to user without this fix. Why do we need it in case
> > we return error from protocol-level handler?
> 
> Because as far as I can say the family-level handler already has such error
> returning code in __sock_diag_rcv_msg. Or you mean something else?

OK, it seems I got what you mean, cooking/testing new patch.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-03 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-02 17:35 [RFC] net: netlink -- Allow netlink_dump to return error code if protocol handler is missed Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-11-03 16:17 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-11-03 16:39   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-11-03 19:16     ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121103191617.GD32458@moon \
    --to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).