From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:54:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20121120.135409.1810847883436963918.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20121120174513.GA21618@paolo-ThinkPad-W520> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rizzo@iet.unipi.it, fchecconi@gmail.com To: paolo.valente@unimore.it Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121120174513.GA21618@paolo-ThinkPad-W520> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Paolo Valente Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:45:13 +0100 > - struct sk_buff *skb; > + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; This is not really an improvement, now the compiler can think that NULL is passed eventually into qdisc_bstats_update(). Please make the logic easier for the compiler to digest. For example, restructure the top-level logic into something like: skb = NULL; if (!list_empty(&in_serv_agg->active)) skb = qfq_peek_skb(in_serv_agg, &cl, &len); else len = 0; /* no more active classes in the in-service agg */ if (len == 0 || in_serv_agg->budget < len) { ... /* * If we get here, there are other aggregates queued: * choose the new aggregate to serve. */ in_serv_agg = q->in_serv_agg = qfq_choose_next_agg(q); skb = qfq_peek_skb(in_serv_agg, &cl, &len); } if (!skb) return NULL; That way it is clearer, to both humans and the compiler, what is going on here. Thanks.