* [PATCH] xfrm: Fix the gc threshold value for ipv4
2012-11-22 7:56 pull request: ipsec 2012-11-22 Steffen Klassert
@ 2012-11-22 7:56 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-11-22 20:25 ` pull request: ipsec 2012-11-22 David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2012-11-22 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: Herbert Xu, netdev
The xfrm gc threshold value depends on ip_rt_max_size. This
value was set to INT_MAX with the routing cache removal patch,
so we start doing garbage collecting when we have INT_MAX/2
IPsec routes cached. Fix this by going back to the static
threshold of 1024 routes.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 2 +-
net/ipv4/route.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c | 13 +------------
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 6f0ba01..63445ed 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ struct xfrm6_tunnel {
};
extern void xfrm_init(void);
-extern void xfrm4_init(int rt_hash_size);
+extern void xfrm4_init(void);
extern int xfrm_state_init(struct net *net);
extern void xfrm_state_fini(struct net *net);
extern void xfrm4_state_init(void);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index a8c6512..200d287 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2597,7 +2597,7 @@ int __init ip_rt_init(void)
pr_err("Unable to create route proc files\n");
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
xfrm_init();
- xfrm4_init(ip_rt_max_size);
+ xfrm4_init();
#endif
rtnl_register(PF_INET, RTM_GETROUTE, inet_rtm_getroute, NULL, NULL);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index 05c5ab8..3be0ac2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
@@ -279,19 +279,8 @@ static void __exit xfrm4_policy_fini(void)
xfrm_policy_unregister_afinfo(&xfrm4_policy_afinfo);
}
-void __init xfrm4_init(int rt_max_size)
+void __init xfrm4_init(void)
{
- /*
- * Select a default value for the gc_thresh based on the main route
- * table hash size. It seems to me the worst case scenario is when
- * we have ipsec operating in transport mode, in which we create a
- * dst_entry per socket. The xfrm gc algorithm starts trying to remove
- * entries at gc_thresh, and prevents new allocations as 2*gc_thresh
- * so lets set an initial xfrm gc_thresh value at the rt_max_size/2.
- * That will let us store an ipsec connection per route table entry,
- * and start cleaning when were 1/2 full
- */
- xfrm4_dst_ops.gc_thresh = rt_max_size/2;
dst_entries_init(&xfrm4_dst_ops);
xfrm4_state_init();
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread