From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]realtek:r8169: Bugfix or workaround for missing extended GigaMAC registers settings
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:34:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121202163449.GA20796@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121201114401.GA3989@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:44:01PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> :
> > + /*
> > + *This is a fix for BIOS forget to set
> > + *extend GigaMAC registers
> > + *Wang YanQing 12/1/2012
> > + */
>
> This part will go into the changelog.
I think brevity comment in code is good for
code's readableness. We read out the MAC{0,4},
and write them back in next line to call rtl_rar_set,
it don't have obvious sense for new readers, so I think
the brevity comment is good. Could you consider remaining
the comment except the no sense line "Wang YanQing 12/1/2012"?
>
> > + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34) {
> > + rtl_rar_set(tp, dev->dev_addr);
> > + }
>
> rtl_rar_set already includes a RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34 test and non-8168evl
> devices are already able to stand an extra MAC{0, 4} write. I'll check
> it does not hurt on different 81xx devices and submit an update.
I add the test code to ignore the an extra MAC{0,4} write for non-8168evl
devices, and if you think it is not a issue, then I agree with you to remove
the test code.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-02 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-30 23:21 [PATCH v3]realtek:r8169: Bugfix or workaround for missing extended GigaMAC registers settings Wang YanQing
2012-12-01 11:44 ` Francois Romieu
2012-12-02 16:34 ` Wang YanQing [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121202163449.GA20796@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).