netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	krkumar2@in.ibm.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr, shiyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:11:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121203111118.GC26167@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC7896.4010504@redhat.com>

On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:01:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 05:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 02:05:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> On Monday, December 03, 2012 12:34:08 PM Rusty Russell wrote:
> >>> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>> +static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * Converting between virtqueue no. and kernel tx/rx queue no.
> >>>> + * 0:rx0 1:tx0 2:cvq 3:rx1 4:tx1 ... 2N+1:rxN 2N+2:txN
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +static int vq2txq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	int index = virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq);
> >>>> +	return index == 1 ? 0 : (index - 2) / 2;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int txq2vq(int txq)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	return txq ? 2 * txq + 2 : 1;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int vq2rxq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	int index = virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq);
> >>>> +	return index ? (index - 1) / 2 : 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int rxq2vq(int rxq)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	return rxq ? 2 * rxq + 1 : 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>> I thought MST changed the proposed spec to make the control queue always
> >>> the last one, so this logic becomes trivial.
> >> But it may break the support of legacy guest. If we boot a legacy single queue 
> >> guest on a 2 queue virtio-net device. It may think vq 2 is cvq which is indeed 
> >> rx1.
> > Legacy guyest support should be handled by host using feature
> > bits in the usual way: host should detect legacy guest
> > by checking the VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS feature.
> >
> > If VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS is acked, cvq is vq max_virtqueue_pairs * 2.
> > If it's not acked, cvq is vq 2.
> >
> 
> We could, but we didn't gain much from this.

It just seems cleaner and easier to understand.

> Furthermore, we need also
> do the dynamic creation/destroying of virtqueues during feature
> negotiation which seems not supported in qemu now.

It's not *done* in qemu now, but it seems easy: just call
virtio_add_queue for vq2 and on from virtio_net_set_features.
As features can be modified multiple times, we
should add virtio_del_queue and call that beforehand
to get to the known state (two vqs).

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-03 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 10:15 [net-next rfc v7 0/3] Multiqueue virtio-net Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 1/3] virtio-net: separate fields of sending/receiving queue from virtnet_info Jason Wang
2012-12-03  1:55   ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03  5:15     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:18       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  9:22         ` Jason Wang
2012-12-04  3:43       ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-04  9:23         ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:15 ` [net-next rfc v7 2/3] virtio_net: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03  5:47     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03  2:04   ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-03  6:05     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03  9:47       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:01         ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:11           ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-12-04  9:24             ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 10:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03 10:30     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:00       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  7:35       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  9:27         ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 10:16 ` [net-next rfc v7 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool Jason Wang
2012-12-02 16:09   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-03  6:09     ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 11:25       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-04  0:22         ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121203111118.GC26167@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwhan@filewood.snu.ac.kr \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shiyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).