From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: Use eth_mac_addr() instead of duplicating it Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:47:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20121203224721.GC14494@casper.infradead.org> References: <20121203221732.GA14494@casper.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org To: Jesse Gross Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:59873 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236Ab2LCWrY (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:47:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/03/12 at 02:36pm, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > > bonus: if we ever are to use IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE for > > anything further than to check availability in eth_mac_addr(), > > Open vSwitch will be ready for that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf > > There's no need to send this patch twice (especially to a different > set of people). I'm currently reviewing a large patchset that was > submitted before yours. It's a trivial patch, you seemed busy and we might as well make use of the open net-next window. I see nothing wrong with that.