From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ncardwell@google.com
Cc: edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet_diag: fix oops for IPv4 AF_INET6 TCP SYN-RECV state
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:20:19 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207.132019.1647690876686095833.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354808546-644-1-git-send-email-ncardwell@google.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:42:26 -0500
> Fix inet_diag to be aware of the fact that AF_INET6 TCP connections
> instantiated for IPv4 traffic and in the SYN-RECV state were actually
> created with inet_reqsk_alloc(), instead of inet6_reqsk_alloc(). This
> means that for such connections inet6_rsk(req) returns a pointer to a
> random spot in memory up to roughly 64KB beyond the end of the
> request_sock.
>
> With this bug, for a server using AF_INET6 TCP sockets and serving
> IPv4 traffic, an inet_diag user like `ss state SYN-RECV` would lead to
> inet_diag_fill_req() causing an oops or the export to user space of 16
> bytes of kernel memory as a garbage IPv6 address, depending on where
> the garbage inet6_rsk(req) pointed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Thanks for this fix, but it opens up more questions.
We don't seem to make any validations upon inet_diag_hostcond's
prefix_len. That parameter we pass into bitstring_match() can
be just about anything.
As another example, what if we do an ipv6 128-bit compare on what's
actually an ipv4 address in the inet request sock?
I think we need to, using cond->family, make some kind of validations
upon cond->prefix_len.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 15:42 [PATCH net] inet_diag: fix oops for IPv4 AF_INET6 TCP SYN-RECV state Neal Cardwell
2012-12-07 18:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-12-08 2:30 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-12-08 3:36 ` Neal Cardwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121207.132019.1647690876686095833.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).