From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: joseph.gasparakis@intel.com
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
shemminger@vyatta.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org, gospo@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry@broadcom.com, saeed.bishara@gmail.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:52:39 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207.145239.1408511750725975741.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212071149150.4985@morpheus.jf.intel.com>
From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:41:46 -0800 (PST)
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
>> >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
>> >>
>> >> > So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming
>> >> > if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol
>> >> > driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of
>> >> > patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are
>> >> > the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation.
>> >> > As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used
>> >> > also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
>> >> > indicate these features there from the driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM
>> >> > is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention
>> >> > in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and
>> >> > turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are
>> >> > already HW checksummed.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and
>> >> code comments.
>> >>
>> > Sure. I'll wait to gather some more feedback if there is any and I will
>> > re-spin this off adding more code comments and clarify this in the logs.
>>
>> Great.
>>
>> Please note that this request applies to your receive side change too.
>>
> I believe the logs are sufficient in the rx patch:
>
> This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received
> checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of
> the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit
> and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
>
> ...but I can add more comments to the code if this is what you are
> referring to.
Yes, please do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 1:56 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] tunneling: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 1:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] net: " Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 10:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-07 16:45 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-12-07 17:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-07 18:24 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 19:28 ` David Miller
2012-12-07 19:41 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 19:37 ` David Miller
2012-12-07 19:52 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 19:52 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-12-07 20:18 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 23:15 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-12-07 1:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] net: Handle encapsulated offloads before fragmentation or handing to lower dev Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 23:15 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-12-07 1:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] vxlan: capture inner headers during encapsulation Joseph Gasparakis
2012-12-07 23:16 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-12-07 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] ixgbe: Adding tx encapsulation capability Joseph Gasparakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121207.145239.1408511750725975741.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=dmitry@broadcom.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph.gasparakis@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=saeed.bishara@gmail.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).