netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: "Yurij M. Plotnikov" <Yurij.Plotnikov@oktetlabs.ru>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexandra N. Kossovsky" <Alexandra.Kossovsky@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: PMTU discovery is broken on kernel 3.7.1 for UDP sockets
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:34:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220073445.GM18940@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355945864.2676.21.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:37:44PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:27 +0400, Yurij M. Plotnikov wrote:
> > On 12/19/12 17:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 17:10 +0400, Yurij M. Plotnikov wrote:
> > >    
> > >> On kernel 3.7.1 I get strange behaviour of IP_MTU_DISCOVER socket
> > >> option. The behaviour in case of IP_PMTUDISC_DO and IP_PMTUDISC_WANT
> > >> values of IP_MTU_DISCOVER socket option on SOCK_DGRAM socket are the
> > >> same and packet is always sent with "Don't Fragment" bit in case of
> > >> IP_PMTUDISC_WANT. Also, the value of IP_MTU socket option is not updated.
> > >>      
> > > You could try reverting:
> > >
> > > commit ee9a8f7ab2edf801b8b514c310455c94acc232f6
> > > Author: Steffen Klassert<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
> > > Date:   Mon Oct 8 00:56:54 2012 +0000
> > >
> > >      ipv4: Don't report stale pmtu values to userspace
> > >
> > >      We report cached pmtu values even if they are already expired.
> > >      Change this to not report these values after they are expired
> > >      and fix a race in the expire time calculation, as suggested by
> > >      Eric Dumazet.
> > >
> > > Still, PMTU information is not supposed to expire for 10 minutes...
> > >
> > >    
> > With reverted commit there is no such problem on 3.7.1: IP_MTU is 
> > updated and DF is set only for the first packet in case of 
> > IP_PMTUDISC_WANT.
> [...]
> 
> So it looks like something is going wrong with the expiry calculation
> here.
> 
> This change shouldn't affect the PMTU actually used by the kernel, but
> could affect Onload since that relies on netlink route updates to keep
> in synch.  You didn't say you were using Onload, but if you are then we
> should not bother netdev with this until we can demonstrate a problem
> that involves only the kernel stack.
> 

I'm really surprised that this change can have such an effect,
it changes nothing at the kernels pmtu handling. When looking
at the code, I found that we may report a mtu value from a stale
dst_entry when we query the mtu value with the IP_MTU socket
option. But a subsequent send() should update the socket cached
dst_entry, so at most one packet should be affected.

Does the patch below change anything?


diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index 3c9d208..1049ce0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static int do_ip_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	{
 		struct dst_entry *dst;
 		val = 0;
-		dst = sk_dst_get(sk);
+		dst = sk_dst_check(sk, 0);
 		if (dst) {
 			val = dst_mtu(dst);
 			dst_release(dst);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-19 13:10 PMTU discovery is broken on kernel 3.7.1 for UDP sockets Yurij M. Plotnikov
2012-12-19 13:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-19 14:27   ` Yurij M. Plotnikov
2012-12-19 19:37     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-20  7:14       ` Yurij M. Plotnikov
2012-12-20  7:34       ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2012-12-20 11:22         ` Yurij M. Plotnikov
2012-12-20 12:35           ` Steffen Klassert
2012-12-21 10:22             ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-14  8:26               ` Yurij M. Plotnikov
2013-01-14 12:52                 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18  8:11                 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18  8:14                   ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ipv4: Invalidate the socket cached route on pmtu events if possible Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18 19:38                     ` David Miller
2013-01-19  0:54                     ` Julian Anastasov
2013-01-21  6:43                       ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18  8:15                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ipv4: Add a socket release callback for datagram sockets Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18 19:39                     ` David Miller
2013-01-18  8:16                   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] xfrm4: Invalidate all ipv4 routes on IPsec pmtu events Steffen Klassert
2013-01-18 19:39                     ` David Miller
2013-01-21  6:48                       ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-21 12:04                       ` Steffen Klassert
2013-01-21 11:31                   ` PMTU discovery is broken on kernel 3.7.1 for UDP sockets Yurij M. Plotnikov
2013-01-21 11:38                     ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121220073445.GM18940@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=Alexandra.Kossovsky@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=Yurij.Plotnikov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).