From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] bridge: respect RFC2863 operational state Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:32:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20121230.023237.824657555139331896.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20121227222854.6ec132dd@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20121228.152754.707370216340290808.davem@davemloft.net> <20121228201522.62a48370@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40194 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753895Ab2L3Kci (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:32:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121228201522.62a48370@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:15:22 -0800 > The bridge link detection should follow the operational state > of the lower device, rather than the carrier bit. This allows devices > like tunnels that are controlled by userspace control plane to work > with bridge STP link management. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Applied.